How to recut and remix your film… a terrific example

The power of editing never ceases to amaze me – actors, writers, DPs, designers, all offer incredible contributions to a story, but it’s the editor who takes that heady cocktail of ideas, creativity, drama, misfires, failures, surprises, technical problems etc etc that happened on set / location, and makes it all work as best it can.

This is a process that requires tough choices, reflection and an unwavering dedication to the audience.

In the 50 Kisses process, I can pretty much say that 98% of the films submitted needed some work – and some films needed a lot of work.

Not all the filmmakers have engaged with the open process we created, of getting feedback from us, as well as the crowd – and I have to tell you, there has been some extraordinarily valuable feedback left on the website by other filmmakers (the crowd) – so some film makers have, in my view, missed a great learning experience.

By example, one film I felt needed work was Beryl by Capital City Films. Below is the film that the filmmakers submitted as a completed, final cut. Give it a watch now, from beginning to end and then read on.

So what did you think of the film? Take a second to write some bullet points. Stop reading now and come back after you have made your list.

Now here’s what we thought and left as public feedback.

  • The beginning is over complicated and could be reduced.
  • The music is too dominating and forces the film into ‘farce’ comedy instead of character comedy.
  • We suggest removing most or all of the music.
  • We suggest cutting the head off the film too, so it begins as the new nurse arrives – that way we don’t know that she is fooling with him – it will work better at the end if we don’t know that she hasn’t really lost her mind, this is old ladies behaving badly.
  • We suggest reducing the kiss and changing / removing the music, again it forces the drama into farce comedy and not human comedy.
  • The strength of the story is two old women behaving naughtily.
  • Give it a go.

Does your list chime in with ours?

And here is the re-cut just submitted.

What do you think? Does it chime in with your notes and observations?

For me at least, this is a huge improvement. It shows great courage by Capital films that they were willing to engage with the process publically – and for me, the benefit is that the film is much stronger.

So why did the film makers even submit that first edit?

The terrible truth is that we all loose perspective. That’s why we need feedback AND to take a break from the edit so that we can see it with fresh eyes when we come back to it.

So the real lesson here is to get feedback on your work BEFORE announcing it is completed – and give yourself enough time in editing to get it right.

Remember, your film will only ever be viewed by ‘that-important-person-you-have-been-chasing’ just the ONCE. Make sure that it’s the very best that it can be.

Onwards and upwards!

Chris Jones
My movies
My Facebook
My Twitter @LivingSpiritPix

2 Responses to How to recut and remix your film… a terrific example

  1. Damian Knight November 30, 2012 at 1:04 pm #

    All so true – as an editor myself I see my role as the custodian of the story, for all sorts of different reasons Directors and Producers can loose sight of the story they are trying to tell and I feel it is my responsibility to help them back on that path or to always try and offer solutions to problems we may encounter along the way.

  2. Graham Lester George November 30, 2012 at 3:38 pm #

    Great example of what an editor can do to lift a film – believe me I know, I’m struggling to edit my latest short and wishing I could get a talented editor on board.

    And by the way guys “loose” means not firm or tight – it does not mean to be deprived of or misplace! That word is “lose”. Sorry, but it’s one of those things that gets me going. And while I’m at it, all those of you out there who spell “definite” with an “a” as in “definate”, I know where you live and I’m coming to get you.

Leave a Reply

tumblr statistics